• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • DMCA
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Home
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
      • Copyright Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Child Law
    • Women Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
      • Cyber law
      • Traffic law
  • Attorney
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice
  • Contact Us
  • Pages
    • About Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • DMCA
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
No Result
View All Result
Law Luxury
No Result
View All Result
Home Copyright Law

The media organisation paid via the EU Parliament to make a video promoting a copyright law it stood to make tens of millions from once sued a photographer for complaining that they’d ripped him off

Dominick Rios by Dominick Rios
August 20, 2022
in Copyright Law
0

Yesterday, I wrote about how MEP Julia Reda resolved the mystery of ways the European Parliament got here to supply a batshit smear-campaign video selling the new Copyright Directive and smearing the opposition to the Directive (along with signatories to the most important petition in human history): it grew to become out that the video was produced using AFP, a large media business enterprise that stands to make hundreds of thousands if the Directive passes. Now that is bad enough, but studying Mike Masnick’s Techdirt insurance of this issue reminded me of something else about AFP, the one’s campaigners for the strongest feasible copyright regime:

Summary show
Related Posts
Music Modernization Act
How to Copyright an Image Using Online Tools
How to Find the Copyright Song for Your Music Video
Get the Lowdown on the New Copyright Laws in the United States

Related Posts

Music Modernization Act

How to Copyright an Image Using Online Tools

How to Find the Copyright Song for Your Music Video

Get the Lowdown on the New Copyright Laws in the United States

The media organisation paid via the EU Parliament to make a video promoting a copyright law it stood to make tens of millions from once sued a photographer for complaining that they'd ripped him off 1lower back in 2010, AFP used a photographer’s pictures of the Haiti quake without permission or compensation. While the photographer complained, AFP sued the photographer, arguing that every photo posted to Twitter is presumptively lawful to re-use and searching for a judgment maintaining this view. (AFP lost and needed to pay the photog $1.2 million). The factor being that AFP has a highly selective form of copyright fundamentalism. In relation to copyright guidelines that would pad its backside line by using millions, no cost is simply too high. But while it’s far playing rapid-and-free with others’ copyright, it’s going to threaten and try to bankrupt the aggrieved birthday party.

Next Post

Find Out If Top Law Schools Are Necessary or Useless

No Result
View All Result

Today Trending

No Content Available

Recent Post

Could We Fix the Divorce Rate in the United States?

February 7, 2023

Department of Labor and Employment in the United States

February 7, 2023

Music Modernization Act

February 5, 2023
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • DMCA
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Mail us: admin@lawluxury.com

Copyright © 2023 lawluxury - All Rights Reserved to Us!

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
      • Copyright Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Child Law
    • Women Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
      • Cyber law
      • Traffic law
  • Attorney
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice
  • Contact Us
  • Pages
    • About Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • DMCA
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use

Copyright © 2023 lawluxury - All Rights Reserved to Us!