It would possibly strike you as suddenly that, in 2019, there are still golf clubs in America that most effectively allow men to grow to be participants. Several distinctive golf courses, consisting of the Burning Tree Club in Bethesda, Md. And Butler National Golf Club in Oak Brook, Ill., holds to disclaim memberships to women based on their sex.
They do so legally, too.

The denial of memberships to girls golfers—regardless of their athletic capacity, golf accomplishments, social fame, or monetary wherewithal to pay a club fee—resurfaced as a subject this week. As designated by Sports Illustrated writer Daniel Rapaport, Scotland’s Muirfield announced that it’d admit girls contributors for the first time on account of its founding in 1744. A dozen ladies, along with three guys, are anticipated to join the club this month.
This is an extensive, if unsurprising, development of thinking about recent occasions related to Muirfield. In 2016, a club vote failed to attain the 2 0.33 majority required to enact a rule change to admit girls. Shortly thereafter, the British Open’s organizing entity, the Royal and Ancient (R&A), announced that Muirfield could not host the destiny British Open see you later as it maintained its men-only coverage. This turned into a blow to a membership that had hosted the Open sixteen times, along with as recently as 2013, when Phil Mickelson won.
Unsurprisingly, the loss of the Open had each revenue consequence and reputational implications for the club. This prompted many other members’ votes, and this time Muirfield’s contributors did indeed vote to invite ladies to the membership. By dropping its policy of gender segregation and by now including women members, Muirfield, which is owned by way of the Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers, hopes to rejoin the Open rotation. It could be several years earlier than that could occur. Royal Portrush will host the Open next month, even as Royal St. George’s, St. Andrews, and Royal Liverpool will accomplish that, respectively, from 2020 to 2022.
Muirfield’s selection pays homage to Augusta National Golf Club’s policy to allow women contributors in 2012. The choice via the invitation-most effective membership in Georgia observed years of controversy and criticism over its best-male membership coverage—a policy that sparked an excessive-profile motion led utilizing women’s rights activist Martha Burk and contributed to lost sponsorship opportunities. Augusta’s coverage even denied memberships to U.S. Supreme Court Justices who were girls till the landmark switch seven years in the past when former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice became one of the first two women to sign up for Augusta. In April, the membership hosted the primary inaugural Augusta National Women’s Amateur.
Other clubs haven’t been modified. Burning Tree, for instance, reportedly has no girls’ locker rooms or bathrooms. New York’s Garden City Golf Club (now not confused with the Garden City Country Club) features a male-handicapped club. Ass Newsday’s Jim Baumbach explored in an article final 12 months, and it is so private that it doesn’t have an internet site.
The exclusivity of private golfing publications’ clubs is critical to understanding their potential to exclude girls in the face of civil rights legal guidelines.
How is undisguised and unvarnished discrimination against women still lawful as our United States nears the 1/3 decade of the twenty-first century?
As a place to begin, the reality that clubs are private agencies does no longer, on its own, authorize them to discriminate.
The federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the idea of race, color, faith and a national foundation. In the context of employment, Title VII of the Act also prohibits discrimination on the premise of sex.
Further, the Act does not exclusively regulate public entities. It also governs personal groups and, when those organizations are places of “public lodging,” how one’s groups serve customers. A commercial enterprise is considered an area of public lodging when it’s typically open to the general public. Examples include sports arenas, movie theaters, eating places, daycare facilities, gyms, gas stations, and banks. Other federal legal guidelines, consisting of Title IX in 1972, limit discrimination based on sex in education and associated fields.
These federal legal guidelines do no longer but adjust private club clubs with recognition to their membership regulations. A non-public membership club, as it is occasionally called, is one this is explicitly now not open to the public. This form of membership also determines—and is predicted to provide a clean observation of—precise criteria for the club. Such criteria need to be ostensibly relevant to the membership’s motive.
Private clubs are available in all shapes and sizes, consisting of social clubs, fraternal golf clubs, USA clubs, and, of course, golf clubs. Many personal clubs require that a prospective member be encouraged to utilize a present member, showcase certain expert traits, partake in relevant membership reports, and get hold of a favorable vote from the membership’s membership committee. For many non-public clubs, potential members must also be prepared to pay the price to benefit the club.
Private clubs have been valued over the years. Many have helped ladies and men build friendships and domesticate lasting personal and professional relationships. An organization is a “non-public membership” that does not routinely invite suspicion or scorn. Many non-public golf clubs forge significant bonds among well-intentioned people.